The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Job Bank Events ► Resources ► Contact
Articles Briefs People Blog Books Forum Quote of the Week Reprint of the Month
   

The Use Of Epidemiologic Evidence For Public Health Is Doomed To Fail Without Champions According To Tobacco Control Expert

Keynote Speaker Shares Important Lessons That Apply To All Public Health Issues

 

It’s a paradox. Smoking and lung cancer are the perfect example of the power of epidemiologic evidence to bring about important social change, and the perfect example of the inadequacy of data to bring about important social change, according to Matthew Myers, President of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Speaking to The Epidemiology Monitor following his keynote address to a special meeting of the Young Epidemiology Scholars (YES) program in Washington in early June, Myers noted that “The effort to reduce tobacco use and the death and disease caused by it is often seen as one of the great public health victories, but while the progress that has been made is impressive, the battle is far from over. There are extraordinarily important lessons that apply to all public health issues.”

Disease Burden

In a talk entitled “Putting the Power of Science to Work—It Takes Leadership As Shown by Both The Failure and the Success in US and Global Tobacco Control”, Myers laid out the challenge facing scientists and others committed to tobacco control.

There were 100 million deaths from tobacco in the 20th century and an estimated 1 billion people will die from tobacco in the 21st century if current trends continue. According to Myers, tobacco is the leading preventable cause of death killing more than 400,000 annually which is a larger number than those dying from AIDS, alcohol, car accidents, murders, suicides, and fires combined. Nearly 90% of lung cancer cases, one third of the total cancer deaths, and twenty percent of the deaths from heart disease are tobacco related. Tobacco results in 96.7 billion in annual health care costs.

Hurdles To Policy Action

In his presentation, Myers sought to explain some of the reasons behind the slower than warranted progress in tobacco control. He noted that the tobacco industry was the first to recognize the power of politics and of political action and the importance of framing the debate. Thus, the industry developed political friends in high places, according to Myers, used the media to frame the issue as one of an individual’s right to choose or tobacco as a legal product or tobacco control as government intrusion, and it created scientific create doubt about the science.

He reiterated that in epidemiology and public health it is rarely enough to produce science and assume that change will happen. Change requires leaders, leadership, dedication, and sustained commitment, said Myers.

Three Hurdles

Like other public health issues, tobacco is a health issue, but its solution is a political AND social issue according to Myers. “All policy change faces three hurdles,” said Myers, including 1) “uninformed policy makers and the public, 2) inertia, and 3) active opposition—often from powerful forces that creates a lack of political will.”

To address these hurdles, Myers claimed a solid scientific base is a prerequisite. Stated most simply, “we must have the facts and serve as the information resource,” according to Myers.

More About Hurdles

Myers elaborated on overcoming the hurdles by saying that facts must be followed by achieving a public recognition of the problem. This he argued for in the form of media campaigns to keep the issue visible and framed as a serious problem with a sense of urgency if not public outrage.

Next he highlighted the importance of gaining support from organizations and individuals to join in the fight because “when priorities collide, political leaders do what they believe the people who are active care about.” He urged non-governmental groups to relate to government by helping where appropriate but pushing where necessary. He made a distinction between coalition building and advocacy stating that direct advocacy for public policies that make a difference is crucial and that advocates need to know who counts to make change take place. He cautioned that change does not occur overnight ---“it is a marathon not a sprint.”

Formula for Success

He told the audience “it is our responsibility to address all three hurdles.” His formula for success in bringing about change is: Science + Communications + Advocacy + Coalition Building = Policy Action, Environmental and Behavior Change. Individual leaders are required to make these elements happen, he said, and the roles of the engaged persons can vary depending on the circumstances, but all of the elements must be addressed.

Staying Objective